Every Indian wants action against others who are not in compliance with law and disregard law of land. Same time, Ministry of Corporate Affairs was forced to introduce the condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018 within 1140 days (roughly 3 years) from the conclusion of earlier such scheme. Between these two schemes, the name of lakhs of companies was removed from Registry and list of Directors 3,09,614 disqualified directors released to the public domain because of such non – compliance. With fear of legal actions, corporate India and professional India welcome this scheme with critics. The strong analysis ahead.
Compliance way or Confine way! The Government made it clear. Directors who were on a long-term picnic after removal of names of their “shell companies” are now offered sleepless nights. I appreciate.
Ministry of Corporate Affairs issued two important lists in this regard –
- List Of Directors Associated With Struck Off Companies U/S 248
- List Of Disqualified Directors U/S 164 (2)(A)
Posted in Chapter IX - CA2013, Chapter XI - CA2013, Chapter XVIII - CA2013, Chapter XXIX - CA2013, Companies Act 2013
Tagged Annual Accounts, Annual Filing, Annual Returns, Disqualified Director, National Company Law Tribunal, Registrar of Companies, Removal of Name, Restoration of Companies, Shell Companies, Strike – off companies, Winding Up
Ministry of corporate came out with minor but significant decision in the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014 by way of the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) 2nd Amendment Rules, 2016.
According to Section 148 (3) of CA 2013 and Cost audit Rules 2014, cost auditor shall be appointed by the Board.
According to Section 148(3) of CA2013 and Audit and Auditor Rules, 2014 Remuneration shall be determined by the Members (in general meeting).
Now, according to Contract Act, 1872 (or in common law) this contract of appointment of cost auditor completes at General Meeting only that too on passing on resolution.
Query 1 – should we call it as “approval/ratification of remuneration or cost auditor” or “appointment of cost auditor” in general meeting? Unlikely but interesting situation will be where in members in general meeting does not ratify remuneration or modify the remuneration.
First case, no contract and second case counter offer. Further interesting, shall cost auditor bound to accept modified remuneration or not?
Ministry of Corporate Affairs came with amendment to the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014, last month. These rules has been published in official gazette on 27th July 2016 and came into force on that date. In this post, we will discuss these amendments in this blog post.
Yesterday late evening, I posted here about press release issued by Ministry of Corporate Affairs. Soon thereafter, two files uploaded on Official Gazette website with two notifications in each. In earlier post here today, we discussed establishment and jurisdiction of various NCLT benches.
In this post, we will have a bird’s eye view on Sections notified on 1st June 2016 related to NCLT.
Posted in Chapter I - CA2013, Chapter II - CA2013, Chapter IX - CA2013, Chapter VI - CA2013, Chapter VII – CA2013, Chapter XI - CA2013, Chapter XIV - CA2013, Chapter XV - CA2013, Chapter XXVII - CA2013, Companies Act 2013, CorpGov, Governance and Responsibility
Tagged Accounts, Annual General Meeting, Annual Return, Articles, Auditor, Board of Directors, Boards’ Report, class-action suits, Debentures, deposits, Deposits Creditors and Charges, General Meeting, Incorporation, Incorporation & Registration, Inquiry, INQUIRY AND INVESTIGATION, Inspection, Investigation, Members and Shareholders, Memorandum, National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, National Company Law Tribunal, NCLAT, NCLT, Oppression and Mismanagement, Shares and Securities, Statutory Audit