Tag Archives: Removal of Name

Failure in Physical Verification – Removal of Name


In the last post here, we discussed the Companies (Incorporation) Third Amendment Rules, 2022, which inserted Rule 25B with effect from 20 August 2022 (issued on 18 August 2022).

Failure in Physical Verification

In terms of Rule 25B sub-rule (5), based on the physical verification report, the Registrar shall form an opinion on whether the office is capable of receiving and acknowledging all communications and notices. If the Registrar finds the office incapable of receiving and acknowledging all communications and notices, it will send a notice to the company and all the directors:

  • of his intention to remove the name of the company from the register of companies; and
  • requesting them to send their representations along with copies of relevant documents, if any, within thirty days from the date of the notice.

The Registrar may take action under Section 248 of the Act based on the physical verification report and the representations made by the company and its directors.

Notice for Removal of Name

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs, on 26 August 2022, published the Companies (Removal of Names of Companies from the Register of Companies) Second Amendment Rules, 2022 by Notification GSR 658(E) dated 24 August 2022.

This amendment effectively amends the notice for Notice by Registrar for removal of the name of a company from the register of companies in Form STK – 1.

Additional ground for removal of the name of a company from the register of the companies maintained by the Registrar of Companies. Till the amendment following three grounds were there:

  • The company has failed to commence its business within one year of its incorporation;
  • The company is not carrying on any business or operation for a period of two immediately preceding financial years and has not made any application within such period for obtaining the status of a dormant company under section 455; and
  • The subscribers to the memorandum have not paid the subscription which they had undertaken to pay at the time of incorporation of a company, and a declaration to this effect has not been filed within one hundred and eighty days of its incorporation under sub-section (1) of section 10A.

Now, a fourth ground is added to the list: “the company is not carrying on any business or operations, as revealed after the physical verification carried out under sub-section (9) of section 12”.

Public Notice of proposed removal of the name of the company from the register of companies under Section 248(1) and 248(2), namely Form STK – 5A and Form STK – 5 are also amended to similar effect.

To Join my telegram Channel: https://t.me/AishMGhrana
To Join my telegram discussion group (only for CA/CS/CMA/IP/RV): https://t.me/AishMGhrana

Physical verification of the Registered Office of a Company


“Inspector Raj”, in its whatsoever name and whichever form, is a necessary evil in India.

The Companies (Amendment) Ordinance, 2018, with its 2019 version and final avatar, the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2019, inserted Section 12(9) with effect from 2 November 2018, sown the seed of Physical verification of the Registered Office of a Company.

Despite the Legislative Powers, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs thankfully restrained itself for a long time and tried a self-certification mode. Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) initially notified Rule 25A by way of the Company (Incorporation) Amendment Rules 2019 with effect from 25 February 2019. Surprisingly, this was a one-time exercise in Form INC-22A (Active). The Form Active captured two-dimensional data of the registered office with documents and a photo of one of the directors showing Latitude and Longitude. However, the form might not satisfy the intended purpose of the government. No day-to-day technology presently captures the third dimension of the office – the floor of the building or vertical location of the office from sea level.

While writing on Rule 25A and Form INC-22A (Active) here, I hoped and still wish Form INC-22A (Active) to be an annual exercise as it solves other issues like a failure on the part of management to update the Registered Office Address on Record.

“Fun Fact: Distance between two latitudes is about 111 KM. Distance between two Longitude at the equator is 111 KM while at Poles it is Zero.”

Now, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, with effect from 20 August 2022 (issued on 18 August 2022) notified the Companies (Incorporation) Third Amendment Rules, 2022 and inserted Rule 25B. (Notification at the official site here)

Photo by Ahmet Polat on Pexels.com

For physical verification, under Section 12(9), the Registrar of Companies should have reasonable cause to believe that the company is not carrying on any business or operations; he may cause a physical verification of the registered office of the company. The belief that the company is not carrying on any business or operation from the Registered office does not form a cause for physical verification. This belief should base upon the information or documents made available on MCA 21. His opinion shall not be based on any complaint, media report or other information.

The newly inserted Rule has a vital reference to Section 248, “Power of Registrar to Remove Name of Company from Register of Companies”. We expect notification of a supplementary rule in the Companies (Removal of Name of Companies from the Register of Companies) Rules, 2016. [Note: it is notified and published on 26 August 2022].

Process of Verification

  1. The Registrar shall form a reasoned opinion that the company is not carrying on any business or operations;
  2. The Registrar shall issue an authorisation letter for physical verification;
  3. The Registrar shall visit at the address of the registered office of the company;
  4. The Registrar shall ensure the presence of two witnesses of the locality in which the registered office is situated;
  5. If required, the Registrar may also seek the assistance of the local police for the verification;
  6. The Registrar shall carry the documents filed in support of the address of the registered office of the company;
  7. The Registrar shall collect supporting documents of the address duly authenticated from the occupant of the property (self-attested);
  8. The Registrar shall check the authenticity of the documents filed on MCA21 by cross verification with documents so collected;
  9. The Registrar shall take a photograph of the Registered office while causing the verification (it is not clear if he will collect geo-coordinates also);
  10. The Registrar shall note the date and time of the visit and collect self-attested identity proof of the person available at the property; and
  11. The Registrar shall prepare a physical verification report in the given format.

The consequence of the Physical Verification Report

On the basis of the report of the physical verification, the Registrar shall form an opinion on whether the office is capable of receiving and acknowledging all communications and notices. If the Registrar finds the office incapable of receiving and acknowledging all communications and notices, it will send a notice to the company and all the directors:

  • of his intention to remove the name of the company from the register of companies; and
  • requesting them to send their representations along with copies of relevant documents, if any, within thirty days from the date of the notice.

The Registrar may take action under Section 248 of the Act based on the physical verification report and the representations made by the company and its directors.

To Join my telegram Channel: https://t.me/AishMGhrana
To Join my telegram discussion group (only for CA/CS/CMA/IP/RV): https://t.me/AishMGhrana

Quick Acceptance of Disqualification


The government of India in its crackdown against illicit money and money laundering marked 209,032 for removal of names from its register of companies as shell companies. It also disqualified about 200,000 directors. As happens with most bureaucratic exercises in India, present exercise also raised more questions than it answers. There is no definition of shell companies in Indian law. The term shell companies used widely to denote companies used as a vehicle for money laundering or criminal activities. The term itself denotes that main culprit may be someone else.

Continue reading

Understanding Form DIR – 10


Many years ago one Hindu priest told me, those worshipping Laxmi ji (goddess of wealth) before without satisfying Ganesh Ji (god of goodness) may not get good wealth. We need to follow established a procedure to get the desired result. Without understanding utility of Form DIR – 10, its use may not give the desired result. Here, we will have a discussion.

Continue reading

Remedies for disqualified directors of strike – off companies


Compliance way or Confine way! The Government made it clear. Directors who were on a long-term picnic after removal of names of their “shell companies” are now offered sleepless nights. I appreciate.

Ministry of Corporate Affairs issued two important lists in this regard –

  1. List Of Directors Associated With Struck Off Companies U/S 248
  2. List Of Disqualified Directors U/S 164 (2)(A)

Continue reading

Appeal or Application for Restoration of Names of Company


The National Company Law Tribunal (Amendment) Rules, 2017 notified on 6th July 2017 which came into force in same date inserted Rule 87A the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016. In this post, we will discuss newly inserted rules with brief background.

Continue reading

Accommodation Entry of Professional Misconduct


Recently, an order of honorable Punjab and Haryana High Court was point of discussion and hot debate in professional circle in India. In the order, the High Court direct that name of respondent Vivek Kapoor be removed from the register of members of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India for life.

Continue reading