Category Archives: Chapter VII – CA2013

MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION

No Extension but Facilitation for Late AGM


The General Circular 19/2021 dated 8 December 2021 caused a little confusion among the public. The circular says it is decided to allow the companies whose AGMs are due in the year 2021 to conduct their AGMs on or before 30 June 2022 following the requirements laid in General Circular 20/2020 dated 5 May 2020 that is by video conference or other audio-visual means.

The Circular permits companies to have their AGM for the year 2021 until 30 June 2022 without extending the period. All Registrar of Companies has granted a General Extension for holding Annual General Meeting until 30 November 2021, which date already expired. All Registrar of Companies after that granted case-to-case basis extensions to most companies that applied for additional extensions. Registrar of Companies has no power to extend this period beyond three months ending on 31 December 2021. So, this circular does not extend the period to hold Annual General Meeting.

We have a clear understanding Annual General Meeting of a company is an essential requirement. The law provides a specific period to have an Annual General Meeting and consider the default of the compliance as an offence. But it does not mean that it is impossible or legally unwarranted to have an annual general meeting after the statutory specific period. Not holding Annual General Meeting for three or more years may result in the ending of corporate life. Otherwise, not holding Annual General Meetings or delaying holding Annual general meetings beyond a statutory specific period are offences punishable with a fine. The delay is a compoundable offence.

Present circular facilitates companies that may not hold their annual general meeting within a permitted or extended period. These companies may have their annual general meeting till 30 June 2022 by video conference or other audio-visual means. Where these companies hold their annual general meeting after 30 June 2022, they shall have their annual general meeting in physical mode (unless this period is further extended).

The circular itself clarify this circular shall not be construed as conferring any extension of time for holding annual general meetings by the companies under the Companies Act, 2013. The companies which have not adhered to the relevant timelines shall be liable to legal action.

Thus, companies holding their annual general meetings after 31 December 2021 for the year ended on 31 March 2021, these companies should apply for compounding of offence. Please note, there is one precondition of compounding of offence; a similar offence should not have happened in the last three years.

Many companies hold their annual general meetings for the year ended on 31 March 2020 after extended time expired on 31 December 2020. The Ministry or Registrar of companies has yet not initiated any legal action. It seems the Government is taking a lenient view against these companies. However, by this general circular government signalling companies to have their annual general meeting within time failing which opt for compounding of offence, if possible. Otherwise, the Registrar will take appropriate legal action under the law.

Advertisement

ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING(S) 2021


At the hight of the cold wave at New Delhi, Ministry of Corporate Affairs suddenly awakens to issue two circulars within hours. We have an interesting observation: the first one published a regular font Arial/Times New Roman (who cares the font) but second used a font called – Comic Sans MS. Use of the font in a law communication communicates. We will read this circular in this post.

http://mca.gov.in/Ministry/pdf/GeneralCircularNo.02_14012021.pdf

The circular may use simpler language. Without a straightforward acknowledgement of the fact, many companies could not convene their Annual General Meeting due to be held in calendar 2020 it provide a bit of relief. 

The circular applies to companies whose Annual General Meetings:

  1. Were due to be held in the year 2020 (but could not be conducted due to whatsoever reason); or
  2. Become due in the year 2021.

The Government decided to allow these companies to conduct their meetings on or before 31 December 2021.

The circular clarifies that such Annual General Meetings may be conducted in accordance with Circular 20/2020. The Circular 20/2020 allows companies to conduct Annual General Meetings through Video Conferencing or any other audiovisual mode.

The first paragraph of the circular may create two confusions:

a. Due date for the Annual General Meeting for Annual General Meeting legally due to be held any time during the year 2020 is extended till 31 December 2021.

b. Due date for the Annual General Meeting for Annual General Meeting legally due to be held any time during the year 2021 is extended till 31 December 2021.

This possible misinterpretation immediately clarified in the second paragraph.

The second paragraph clarifies that no extension is allowed. All these companies should follow legal time-limits or face legal actions.

We consider the circular as an indication of the government understanding of difficulties faced by companies. Same time it clarifies that no extension is coming for AGM missed 31 December 2020 deadline. 

Secondly, the Government is planning a few announcements in the Budget speech. 

The most important take away from the circular is hidden advice: Companies should not take the risk for the year 2021. 

According to the law, any company which missed legal timeline in the year 2020 may opt for compounding but repeated miss in the year 2021. 

I hope the Government will compound the offence of not holding Annual General Meeting timely during the year 2020 with ease.

Government bless us.

[P.S.: I have no interpretation of the font used.]

Aishwarya Mohan Gahrana

Subscribe on WhatsApp; Send a WhatsApp message “Subscribe AishMGhrana” to +91 96503 38103. For Telegram subscription: t.me/AishMGhrana 

For Email Subscription use this form –

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

FINALLY GENERAL EXTENSION FOR ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING


Just a few days earlier, we made a case here for a general extension for holding Annual General Meeting. The way Government responded through General Circular 28/2020, (presently not accessible) dated 17th August 2020, was not appreciated by Industry and Professional. Now, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs allowed all Registrar of Companies to pass general orders for a general extension for holding Annual General Meeting. Why am I not truly satisfied with these orders?

— More — Continue reading

NOMINEE OF HOLDING COMPANY!!


Corporate world every holding company having a wholly-owned subsidiary have one or more person as “nominee” shareholders to on record as a registered shareholder holding a nominal number shares in a wholly-owned subsidiary company to satisfy the requirement of the minimum number of members. Treating these registered shareholders as “nominee” is not the perspective of the Company Law but of the Contract Law as applicable to the contract between the company and these shareholders. Let us discuss.

Continue reading

POWER OF ATTORNEY BY SHAREHOLDERS


I first time wrote on the matter of the power of Attorney in the year 2015 here. Later, I pointed out the option of power of attorney while discussing on draft guidance note on General Meeting on Secretarial Standard on General Meetings (SS-2). I refereed a 92-year-old case law namely Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd., In Re., AIR 1928 Bom. 80, which is still considered as a valid reference law for proxies. Nowadays due to Covid-19 related travel restrictions, the requirement of Attorney is being felt in cases where proxies may not be used like in two-person companies. There is a temporary law made through MCA Circulars which allows for a limited period to conduct a general meeting through video conferencing. As the abovementioned post was brief and received many queries.

Continue reading

Wholly-owned Subsidiary


The concept of the wholly-owned subsidiary is best understood by layman than a young student of law – particularly of corporate law. The concept practically understood by professional dealing with a wholly-owned subsidiary. A student called me to understand this: “how possible?” I replied, “No, It is not possible in true sense.” Unless one understands it clearly that it is not possible in a true legal sense, only then,  you can understand it. Once understood, you will never believe that a wholly-owned subsidiary is not possible in a true legal sense.

Continue reading

SECOND THE RESOLUTION


When I was scripting a proceeding to be held in an extraordinary general meeting, I faced a question of whether proposing or seconding a resolution is required. My answer was NO unless an amendment to the motion is moved. Before reading further, my readers may check legal provision for the moving and passing a resolution under the (Indian) Companies Act, 2013.

Continue reading

GOOD OPPORTUNITY TO ATTEND AN AGM


Corona is good for corporate governance. The government, without any known intention to do so, adopted an inclusive approach for the benefit of members and shareholder of companies in India. If you are a shareholder in any company in India, this is the best time for you to attend a General Meeting of your company. Of course, you will be part of their decision-making process in all practical manner. Read More to avail best out of this opportunity and share a lot for benefit of lakhs of individual investors and improvement of corporate Governance.

Continue reading

ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING IN YEAR 2020


Annual General Meeting during the year 2020 is not an ordinary affair. This is now recognized by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs. Now, bigger companies are required to facilitate members to present in their Annual General Meeting through Video Conference or other audiovisual means even when holding AGM physically, others have the facility to use hold AGM through VA and OAVM. Circular 20/2020 dated 5th May 2020 extends facility provided by Circulars 14/2020 and 17/2020to hold General Meetings through VA and OAVM to Annual General Meetings.

Continue reading

GENERAL MEETING THROUGH AUDIO VISUAL MEANS


Within days of the nationwide lockdown due to COVID-19 (Corona), Indian Stock exchanges on 26th March 2020 received intimation of first extraordinary general meeting through audiovisual means. This was not legally facilitated. After a great demand, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs came out with a hurried framework through its General Circular 14/2020 dated 8th April 2020, applicable to all listed or unlisted companies. It raises more question that solution as of now but certainly in a good direction. Thereafter Ministry issued General Circular 17/2020 dated 13th April 2020. We have already discussed this framework for companies which are not required to provide the facility of e-voting under the Act. We will in this post discuss this framework for Companies which are required to provide the facility of e-voting under the Act or any other company which has opted for such facility.

Continue reading

GENERAL MEETING THROUGH AUDIO VISUAL MEANS IN OTHER COMPANIES


Within days of the nationwide lockdown due to COVID-19 (Corona), Indian Stock exchanges on 26th March 2020 received intimation of first extraordinary general meeting through audiovisual means. This was not legally facilitated. After a great demand, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs came out with a hurried framework through its General Circular 14/2020 dated 8th April 2020, applicable to all listed or unlisted companies. It raises more question that solution as of now but certainly in a good direction. We will in this post discuss this framework for private and unlisted public companies with less than one thousand members. {Update: This post is updated to incorporate provisions of General Circular 17/2020 dated 13 April 2020}

Continue reading

Form BEN-1


Form BEN  – 1 is a declaration by the beneficial owner who holds or acquires significant beneficial ownership in shares [Pursuant to section 90(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 and rule 2A and rule 3. Many readers requested its actual and understandable copy. I place it hereunder:

Form No. BEN-1

Declaration by the beneficial owner who holds or acquires significant beneficial ownership in shares [Pursuant to section 90(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 and rule 2A and rule 3]

 

To,

Name of the company: ____________________

Registered office address:_______________

 

1. Purpose of filing the form (choose anyone)

  • For the declaration of Significant Beneficial Ownership under Section 90:
  • For Change in Significant Beneficial Ownership under Section 90 :

ID of the Significant Beneficial Owner: (To be allotted by MCA after filing form BEN – 2 first time by reporting company, same will be used for subsequent filings, therefore leave for the first time filling)

  1. Particulars of the holder of the significant beneficial interest:
Name of the Significant Beneficial Owner (Given name and last Name)  
Address and Email id  
Date of Birth/Age  
Father’s/ Mother’s/Spouse’s name  
Occupation  
Nationality  
Passport No. (in case of foreign national)  

 

  1. Nature of indirect holding or exercise of the right in the reporting company through a member of the reporting company (where more than one repeat this para 3 of the Form)

Through Member 1

(a) Type of Member (Company/ LLP/Any other Body Corporate/HUF/ Partnership Firm/Discretionary Trust/Charitable trust/Specific Trust/Revocable Trust /Pooled Investment vehicle (PIV) / Entity controlled by PIV):

(b) Corporate Identity Number (CIN) or Limited Liability Partnership Identification Number (LLPIN) or any other registration number allotted by the regulator established under the Act:

(c) Name of the Member:

(d) Address:

(e) Nature of indirect holding or exercise of the right in the reporting company:

* By virtue of shares

* By virtue of voting rights in shares

* By virtue of rights on distributable dividend or any other distribution

* By virtue of the exercise of control (attach a copy of the agreement)

* By virtue of the exercise of significant influence (attach a copy of the agreement)

(f) Status of significant beneficial owner in the member of the reporting company (choose anyone):

* Individual in case of a company or any other body corporate

* Partner in case of partnership firm or LLP

* Karta in case of HUF

* Trustee in case of a discretionary trust or charitable trust

* Beneficiary in case of a specific trust

* Author or settlor in case of a revocable trust

* General Partner, Investment Manager or CEO in case of pooled investment vehicle or entity controlled by a pooled investment vehicle

(g) In case the member is a partnership firm or LLP, specify whether significant beneficial owner:

* is a partner holds

* majority stake in the body corporate partner

* holds the majority stake in the ultimate holding company of the body corporate partner

(h) In case the member is a company or any other body corporate, specify whether the significant beneficial owner holds:

* majority stake in such company or body corporate

* majority stake in the ultimate holding company of such company or body corporate

(i) Whether Significant Beneficial Owner has any direct holding or right in the reporting company:

* Yes                                                                                    * No

If yes, enter details below:

*By virtue of shares                        %

* By virtue of voting rights in shares                        %

* By virtue of rights on distributable dividend or any other distribution                   %

* By virtue of the exercise of control (attach a copy of the agreement)

* By virtue of the exercise of significant influence (attach a copy of the agreement)

<<Through Member 2

Repeat Para 3 again for member 2 and so on till all member though whom the significant beneficial owner has significant beneficial ownership exhausted>>

 

Date:

Place:

Signature of the holder of the significant beneficial interest

Attachments:

1.
2.
3. etc etc

 

Please note, where the Significant Beneficial Owner is aware and cooperating, she will fill and submit the form BEN – 1 by her own. Otherwise, the secretarial department of the reporting company shall dig layers of its all non-individual members and calculate holdings of all individuals behind these non-individual members.

Please also note, to get the true result, please do not ignore any individual behind any non-individual member because Significant beneficial owner may be hidden behind more one or even 100 non-individual members. MCA has given 10% holding limit to help reporting companies and save their time. Sometimes, we need to be thankful to MCA.

CS Aishwarya Mohan Gahrana

Subscribe on WhatsApp; Send a WhatsApp message “Subscribe AishMGhrana” to +91 96503 38103. For Email Subscription use this form –

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

 

REPORTING COMPANY AND REPORTED OWNERS


On public demand, I am summarizing provisions relating to reporting company and the reported significant beneficial owners.[1]

Reporting Company under Rule 2(f) of SBO Rules, 2018 may be any company as defined under Section 2(20). According to Section 90(4), every company under shall report and file the return. For the practical purpose the return to the Registrar in respect of declaration under section 90Form BEN – 2 does not allow to fill the form if the company has no Significant Beneficial Owner.

Take Away 1: No return if no SBO. Read further to identify SBO.

The reporting company shall in all cases where its member (other than an individual), holds not less than ten per cent of its (a) shares, or (b) voting rights, or (c) right to receive or participate in the dividend or any other distribution payable in a financial year, give notice to such member, seeking information in accordance with subsection (5) of section 90, in Form BEN – 4. [Rule 2A]

Take Away 2: Identify Share not held by an individual (human) as a registered member or owner of beneficial interest. [Do not forget humans though, keep record]

Take Away 3: Send notice to every registered member or owner of beneficial Interest identified in Taka Away 2 having 10% of (a) shares, or (b) voting rights, or (c) right to receive or participate in the dividend or any other distribution payable.

Shares and share capital respectively includes Equity share with or without differential voting and/or other rights and Preference shares.

Voting right means the right of a member of a company to vote in any meeting of the company or by means of postal ballot. Generally, Preference share carries voting power in certain resolutions but where the dividend in respect of a class of preference shares has not been paid for a period of two years or more, such class of preference shareholders shall have a right to vote on all the resolutions placed before the company.

Right to receive dividend may be held by someone who is not a registered member.

Take Away 4: check your dividend distribution in the last two years to preference shareholders.

Take Away 5: calculated beneficial owners and the right to receive dividend or profit participation carefully.

Beneficial Interest in a share includes, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement or otherwise, the right or entitlement of a person alone or together with any other person to—

(i) exercise or cause to be exercised any or all of the rights attached to such share; or

(ii) receive or participate in any dividend or other distribution in respect of such share. [Section 89(10)]

Take Away 6: Beneficial Interest is a wider term than a day to day understanding.

Every individual, who acting alone or together, or through one or more persons or trust, holds beneficial interests of not less than percentage as prescribed, in shares of a company or the right to exercise, or the actual exercising of significant influence or control over the company (herein referred to as “significant beneficial owner”), shall make a declaration to the company, specifying the nature of his interest and other particulars. [Section 90(1)]

Take Away 7: Stay focused on Section 90(1)

If an individual does not hold any right or entitlement indirectly under sub-clauses (i), (ii) or (iii), he shall not be considered to be a significant beneficial owner. [Explanation I to Rule 2(h)]

An individual shall be considered to hold a right or entitlement directly in the reporting company, if he satisfies any of the following criteria, namely:

(i) the shares in the reporting company representing such right or entitlement are held in the name of the individual;

(ii) the individual holds or acquires a beneficial interest in the share of the reporting company under sub-section (2) of section 89, and has made a declaration in this regard to the reporting company.

Take Away 8: individual members and other Individuals with ANY indirect holding or interests need to be identified.

The reporting company may have partial relief form reporting in respect of certain shares held by –

  1. Investor Education and Protection Fund;
  2. A reporting holding company reporting its own SBOs in Form BEN – 2;
  3. Central, State and Local Government (NOTE: Under Indian Constitution of India);
  4. A government company, government body corporate or government entity controlled by Central, State or Local government;
  5. SEBI Registered investment vehicles like MFs, AIFs, REITs, InVITs, (See footnote)[2]; and
  6. RBI, IRDA, PFRDA Registered investment vehicles. [Rule 8]

Take Away 9: Ignore Shares mentioned in Rule 8. Please seek information or send a notice in case of doubt.

To identify an SBO behind a Body Corporate Member; whether company, other bodies corporate, whether Indian or foreign, the reporting company shall identify the individual who

 (a) holds the majority stake in that body corporate member; or

(b) holds the majority stake in the ultimate holding body corporate  (whether incorporated or registered in India or abroad) of that member.

Take Away 10A: Go up to the steps of holdings body corporate till you find individual members. However, just for the purpose of reporting, identify the holder of a majority stake.

To identify an SBO behind a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) identify the karta. Sometime the registered member may have shares in his name but the Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) is actual beneficial owner (through karta). The Karta shall be SBO.

Take Away 10C: Identify Karta in HUF.

To identify an SBO behind partnership entity – Limited Liability Partnership or Partnership Firm whether registered or not, the member of the reporting company is a partnership entity (through itself or a partner), and the SBO individual,-

(a) is a partner; or

(b) holds the majority stake in the body corporate which is a partner of the partnership entity; or

(c) holds the majority stake in the ultimate holding company of the body corporate which is a partner of the partnership entity.

Take Away 10C: In LLP and Partnership, identify the individual partners or SBO as per Take Away 10A where a partner is a body corporate.

To identify an SBO behind the trust, where the member of the reporting company is a trust (through the trustee), and the SBO individual –

(a) is a trustee in case of a discretionary trust or a charitable trust;

(b) is a beneficiary in case of a specific trust;

(c) is the author or settlor in case of a revocable trust.

Take Away 10D: In a trust, SBO individual may differ on a case to case basis.

To identify an SBO behind (a) Pooled Investment Vehicle; or (b) an entity controlled by the pooled investment vehicle, the SBO individual in relation to the pooled investment vehicle,-

(A) is a general partner; or

(B) is an investment manager; or

(C) is a Chief Executive Officer where the investment manager of such pooled vehicle is a body corporate or a partnership entity.

Take Away 10E: In pooled investment Vehicle, identify the decision-maker.

If any individual, or individuals acting through any person or trust, act with a common intent or purpose of exercising any rights or entitlements, or exercising control or significant influence, over a reporting company, pursuant to an agreement or understanding, formal or informal, such individual, or individuals, acting through any person or trust, as the case may be, shall be deemed to be ‘acting together’

Take Away 11: Identity individuals acting together.

Significant Influence means the power to participate, directly or indirectly, in the financial and operating policy decisions of the reporting company but is not control or joint control of those policies.

Take Away 12: Significant Influence may be taken care of.

“significant beneficial owner” in relation to a reporting company means an individual referred to in sub-section (1) of section 90, who acting alone or together, or through one or more persons or trust, possesses one or more of the following rights or entitlements in such reporting company, namely:-

(i) holds indirectly, or together with any direct holdings, not less than ten per cent. of the shares;

(ii) holds indirectly, or together with any direct holdings, not less than ten per cent. of the voting rights in the shares;

(iii) has right to receive or participate in not less than ten per cent. of the total distributable dividend, or any other distribution, in a financial year through indirect holdings alone, or together with any direct holdings;

(iv) has the right to exercise, or actually exercises, significant influence or control, in any manner other than through direct-holdings alone:

Take Away 13: After identifying all individual beneficial owners on all routes, you may find one individual in more than one place or a few individuals acting together.

If an individual does not hold any right or entitlement indirectly under sub-clauses (i), (ii) or (iii), he shall not be considered to be a significant beneficial owner.

Take Away 14: ignore all individuals holding rights or entitlements in the reporting company directly.  

Take Away 15: List out individuals with indirect holdings or individuals having both direct and indirect holdings.

Now, compile the data in the required format. While compiling data, we may face many practical realities.

Special Take Away 1: One individual may have less beneficial ownership from in a single non-individual member but the combined effect of his all beneficial ownership may make him a significant owner.

Special Take Away 2: It is a reporting company which is in a better position to identify SBO then SBO himself, particularly where SBO using multiple member entities in the reporting companies.

Special Learning Point: Beneficial Interests and Beneficial ownership are two different ownership or interest aspect. Do not mingle them.

CS Aishwarya Mohan Gahrana

Subscribe on WhatsApp; Send a WhatsApp message “Subscribe AishMGhrana” to +91 96503 38103. For Email Subscription use this form –

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

 

[1] Please refer all of these posts for details:

[2] Mutual Funds (MFs), Alternative Investment Funds (AIF), Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), Infrastructure Investment Trust (lnVITs) and such other SEBI registered investment vehicles

THE FORM BEN – 2


Form BEN – 2 seems to be a comic strip name for kids but for Indian companies and company secretaries, it seems to be a just another nightmare of corporate governance. On 1st July 2019 BEN – 2 finally arrived. This BEN – 2 is an updated version introduced by the Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) Second Amendment Rules 2019 with effect from the date of publication of the notification in the Official Gazette. In this post we discuss the Form BEN – 2 briefly. Continue reading

Seeking information of Significant Beneficial Ownership


The law stated in this post is valid from 8th February 2019. The earlier post on the subject here was valid from 14th June 2018 till 7th February 2019.

Section 90 of the Companies Act 2013 substituted by a new set of law by the Companies Amendment Act, 2017 with effect from 13th June 2018. It is a drastic change to understand and need urgent attention for all companies. Amended Section 90 and rules made thereunder has already been notified with effect from 13th June 2018 and 14th June 2018. However, the Companies Amendment Ordinance, 2018 as well as The Companies Amendment Act, 2019 amended Section 90 with effect from 2nd November 2018.  Thereafter, the Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) Amendment Rules, 2019 amended the Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) Rules, 2018 with effect from 8th February 2019. Earlier, we discussed Significant Beneficial Interest, declaration, register and return related here and here.  In this post, we will discuss the declaration, register and return of Significant Beneficial Ownership.

Continue reading

Declaration by Significant Beneficial Owner


The law stated in this post is valid from 8th February 2019. The earlier post on the subject here was valid from 14th June 2018 till 7th February 2019.

Section 90 of the Companies Act 2013 substituted by a new set of law by the Companies Amendment Act, 2017 with effect from 13th June 2018. It is a drastic change to understand and need urgent attention for all companies. Amended Section 90 and rules made thereunder has already been notified with effect from 13th June 2018 and 14th June 2018. However, the Companies Amendment Ordinance, 2018 as well as The Companies Amendment Act, 2019 amended Section 90 with effect from 2nd November 2018.  Thereafter, the Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) Amendment Rules, 2019 amended the Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) Rules, 2018 with effect from 8th February 2019. In last post here, we discussed what constitutes Significant Beneficial Ownership under the amended law.  In this post, we will discuss the declaration, register and return of Significant Beneficial Ownership.

Continue reading

SIGNIFICANT BENEFICIAL OWNER


The law stated in this post is valid from 8th February 2019. The earlier post on the subject here was valid from 14th June 2018 till 7th February 2019.

Note: Earlier Section 90 {Invesigation of Beneficial Ownership} as applicable form 1st April 2014 to 13 June 2018 was discussed here.

Section 90 of the Companies Act 2013 substituted by a new set of law. It is a drastic change to understand and need urgent attention for all companies. Amended Section 90 and rules made thereunder has been notified with effect from 13th June 2018 and 14th June 2018. However, the Companies Amendment Ordinance, 2018 as well as The Companies Amendment Act, 2019 amended Section 90 with effect from 2nd November 2018.  Thereafter, the Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) Amendment Rules, 2019 amended the Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) Rules, 2018 with effect from 8th February 2019.

In this post, we will discuss what constitutes Significant Beneficial Ownership under the amended law.

Continue reading

Curious case of Rule 20 of Management and Administration Rules


This blog post has a poll on a question – Whether Explanations to Rule 20, placed just after sub – Rule (2) are still part of Rule 20? Read and take part in the poll.

Continue reading

Serious Penal Consequence of late Annual Filing – landmine ahead


[The law stated in this post is effective from the 7th day of May 2018]

There is a perception that filing of financial statements and other documents with additional fee absolve the company from consequences under section 92, section 137 and conditional exemption given to certain companies by certain notifications issued by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs.

This is also a general view of the companies that any extension granted for the filing of the financial statements and other documents without additional fee grant immunity to the companies from its liabilities under mentioned provisions.

I beg to differ, conditionally.

Continue reading

Shareholders in General Meeting


To be legally correct I will say, all Members of a company may attend a General Meeting including the Annual General Meeting of a company. I will discuss, related aspects in brief.

Member

In legal terminology Section 2(55) of the Companies Act, 2013 defines the term member:

“member”, in relation to a company, means—

(i) the subscriber to the memorandum of the company who shall be deemed to have agreed to become a member of the company, and on its registration, shall be entered as a member in its register of members;

(ii) every other person who agrees in writing to become a member of the company and whose name is entered in the register of members of the company;

(iii) every person holding shares of the company and whose name is entered as a beneficial owner in the records of a depository.”

Members are those shareholders who got shares registered in their name.

A shareholder, who has recently purchased, inherited or received a gift of shares of a company may not become shareholders unless shares are registered in its name. Likewise, a member who has recently sold, died or given a gift of shares may continue as members til such shares are registered in the name of another person.

Please note in case of de-materialised shares, such registration happened immediately.

Notice of (Annual) General Meeting

According to Section 101(3)(a) of the Act, the notice of every meeting of the company shall be given to every member of the company, legal representative of any deceased member or the assignee of an insolvent member.

Quorum

Normally the quorum of a general meeting:

(a) in case of a public company,—

(i) five members personally present if the number of members as on the date of the meeting is not more than one thousand;

(ii) fifteen members personally present if the number of members as on the date of the meeting is more than one thousand but up to five thousand;

(iii) thirty members personally present if the number of members as on the date of the meeting exceeds five thousand;

(b) in the case of a private company, two members personally present shall be the quorum for a meeting of the company.

There is no discrimination among member, who may present. Every member person who received the notice of a general meeting may attend it.

Voting

In normal circumstances, only members who are equity shareholder may vote as per defined voting rights. According to Section 47(1)(a) of the Act, every member of a company limited by shares and holding equity share capital therein, shall have a right to vote on every resolution placed before the company. Presently, it is possible to have different classes of equity shareholders with differential voting rights.

Members, who are preference shareholders may vote in certain circumstances only. Every member of a company limited by shares and holding any preference share capital therein shall, in respect of such capital, have a right to vote only on resolutions placed before the company which directly affect the rights attached to his preference shares and, any resolution for the winding up of the company or for the repayment or reduction of its equity or preference share capital and his voting right on a poll shall be in proportion to his share in the paid-up preference share capital of the company. Where the dividend in respect of a class of preference shares has not been paid for a period of two years or more, such class of preference shareholders shall have a right to vote on all the resolutions placed before the company.