Active Company Tagging Identities and Verification (ACTIVE)


According to old Indian saying – Daroga (Inspector) is the Supreme Sovereign. We, professionals, have a similar experience with Indian corporate law. Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) notified a new rule 25A by way of the Company (Incorporation) Amendment Rules 2019 with effect from 25th February 2019. In this post, we will discuss Rule 25A and Form ACTIVE which technically is Form INC – 22A.

Continue reading

Declaration by Significant Beneficial Owner


The law stated in this post is valid from 8th February 2019. The earlier post on the subject here was valid from 14th June 2018 till 7th February 2019.

Section 90 of the Companies Act 2013 substituted by a new set of law by the Companies Amendment Act, 2017 with effect from 13th June 2018. It is a drastic change to understand and need urgent attention for all companies. Amended Section 90 and rules made thereunder has already been notified with effect from 13th June 2018 and 14th June 2018. However, the Companies Amendment Ordinance, 2018 as well as The Companies Amendment Act, 2019 amended Section 90 with effect from 2nd November 2018.  Thereafter, the Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) Amendment Rules, 2019 amended the Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) Rules, 2018 with effect from 8th February 2019. In last post here, we discussed what constitutes Significant Beneficial Ownership under the amended law.  In this post, we will discuss the declaration, register and return of Significant Beneficial Ownership.

Continue reading

SIGNIFICANT BENEFICIAL OWNER


The law stated in this post is valid from 8th February 2019. The earlier post on the subject here was valid from 14th June 2018 till 7th February 2019.

Note: Earlier Section 90 {Invesigation of Beneficial Ownership} as applicable form 1st April 2014 to 13 June 2018 was discussed here.

Section 90 of the Companies Act 2013 substituted by a new set of law. It is a drastic change to understand and need urgent attention for all companies. Amended Section 90 and rules made thereunder has been notified with effect from 13th June 2018 and 14th June 2018. However, the Companies Amendment Ordinance, 2018 as well as The Companies Amendment Act, 2019 amended Section 90 with effect from 2nd November 2018.  Thereafter, the Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) Amendment Rules, 2019 amended the Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) Rules, 2018 with effect from 8th February 2019.

In this post, we will discuss what constitutes Significant Beneficial Ownership under the amended law.

Continue reading

REGISTERED OFFICE OF THE COMPANY


The government of India promulgated a temporary law called the Companies (Amendment) ordinance 2018 on 2nd November 2018 to by parachute landing of few more reform measure. To continue the law government later promulgated the Company(Amendment) Ordinance, 2019

Readers may read this post as a law applicable with effect from 2nd November 2018 till passing the law by the Parliament. These provisions may continue in force after parliamentary approval. In this post we will discuss, the laws related to registered office in brief post the companies (Amendment) Ordinance 2018 and 2019.

Continue reading

Return of Loans, Deposits and a “not a Deposits”


After the recent amendment dated 22nd January 2019, Form DPT – 3 which has its legal name as “Return of Deposit” shall be used for filing return of deposit or particulars of a transaction not considered as deposit or both. It includes Loan but excludes capital and day to day business receipts. We will discuss seriously latest amendment in these “no longer only the Deposits Rules, 2014”.

Continue reading

Return about Payment to MSME Suppliers


Ministry of Corporate Affairs and Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises came together to protect interests of micro, small and medium enterprises. We will discuss in this post two recent notifications issued by these ministries.

Continue reading

PROCEDURE UNDER THE SARFAESI ACT, 2002


Shreesh Chadha
4th Year BALLB Student,
Jindal Global Law School
Sonipat

In the Statement of Object and Reasons of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act,2002(hereinafter SARFAESI,2002 or Act,2002), it is stated that the recovery of loans was a slow process which consequently resulted in the “mounting levels of Non-Performing Assets”. This act provides for the realization of any security interest in the favour of any secured creditor “without the intervention of the court or tribunal”[1]. This has resulted in a speedy recovery of Non- Performing Assets.

Under this act secured creditors (banks or financial institutions) have many rights for enforcement of security interest under S. 13 of SARFAESI Act, 2002. If the borrower of financial assistance makes any default in repayment of the loan or any instalment and his account is classified as Non-Performing Asset by a secured creditor, then secured creditor may require before the expiry of the period of limitation[2]by written notice. The Impugned Act, does not cover a certain class of assets, for example, any asset other than a non-performing asset, or unsecured loans, loans below ₹100,000 or where remaining debt is below 20% of the original principals stated in S. 31 of the SARFAESI Act,2002.

WHAT IS THE PROCEDURE FOR SALE/AUCTION THAT THE SECURED CREDITOR NEEDS TO FOLLOW?

The procedures laid down in the SARFAESI Act,2002, as well as the Security Enforcement (Rules), 2002, are mandatory, and no divulgence from the same is permitted, as held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India.[3] The procedures to be followed under the Act,2002 are stated hereinbelow.

Procedure of Physical Possession of the secured asset:

  • If the borrower defaults in repayment, under S. 13(2) a demand notice is to be sent by Secured Creditor to the borrower to discharge his liabilities. Such notice persists for 60 days. The demand notice shall contain details and amounts of the amount payable by the borrower.[4] This demand notice can also be objected to by the borrower, which should be replied by the secured creditor within 15 days, and the reply should enumerate the reasons for non-acceptance of such objection. This position was clarified by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India[5]and later amended into the SARFAESI Act, as S. 13 (3A).
  • When the 60 day period concludes, without any discharge by the Borrower, actions can be taken by the Secured Creditor as enumerated under S. 13 (4)- wherein they can take possession of the secured assets, take over the management of the asset, appoint any person to manage the secured asset, require any person who has acquired any of the assets from the borrower to pay the secured creditor.
  • The actions under S. 13 (4) are appealable as enumerated in S. 17- 18. Therefore, the borrower can appeal the actions of the secured creditor in Debt Recovery Tribunal, DRAT, writ in High Court and SLP in Supreme Court.

Procedure of Sale and Auction under the SARFAESI Act,2002:

  • A Sale Notice is required in the case of auctioning off of the secured asset if inviting tenders from the public, or by way of public auction. This sale notice shall be published in 2 leading newspapers, on the website of the secured creditor, and as per the Directions of the Ministry of Finance directions, upload the tender notice on tender.gov.in.
  • The sale notice or possession notice should be effectively served, I.e. in 2 newspapers in circulation in the area as provided for in the SECURITY INTEREST (ENFORCEMENT) RULES,2002.
  • More particularly, the procedure for an auction of immovable assets is given in Rule 8, Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules,2002. the methods of sale of the immovable secured assets include:

(a) by obtaining quotations from the persons dealing with similar secured assets or otherwise interested in buying such assets; or

(b) by inviting tenders from the public;

(c) by holding public auction; or

(d) by private treaty.[6] (after the possession of the asset by a Bank or Financial Institution, they might be willing to sell it to an appropriate buyer through a private deal with a third party)

Procedure regarding payment by purchaser:

The first step is determining the Reserve Price which is the minimum fair market value of the immovable asset as stipulated by the authorized officer, followed by the relevant notice according to the obligations enumerated in Rule 8 (6). The bidding process for public auction shall be done in accordance with Rule 9, Security Interest Rules, 2002 wherein the bidder shall deposit:

(1) Earnest money deposit (at the time of bidding)

(2) 25 per cent of the accepted sales price (including EMD) after successful bidding

(3) 75 per cent of the balance amount within 15 days of the auction.

Upon completion of the above, the sale certificate shall be issued to him. Otherwise, any sale by any other method other than public auction shall be on terms and conditions as decided by the parties.[7]It is also mandated under the Security Interest Rules,2002 that the amount of sale shall not be less than the reserved price.

 àWHAT ARE THE OTHER REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO SECURED CREDITORS?

Section 14 of the Act, 2002 provides a provision for the assistance of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate andDistrict Magistrate in taking possession of the property. According to the Hon’ble High Court of Madras has held that this provision should be given a purposive interpretation in consonance with the Statement of Objects and Reasons of the SARFAESI Act,2002. It was held that the purpose of this provision is to aid the secured creditor of obtaining possession of the asset as soon as possible, and convert a Non-Performing Asset into a source of recovery for the amount due, and transfer the secured asset to a willing third party.[8]

However, it is pertinent to mention that all the rights and interests of symbolic and/or physical possession guaranteed to the secured creditor under the Act,2002 extinguish after the sale to the third party is complete. From the date of the registration of the sale deed, the secured creditor does not have any remedy or course of action under S. 13 or S. 14 of the SARFAESI Act,2002.

In instances where the secured creditor is unable to claim possession over the secured asset after the expiry of the period of the demand notice under S. 13(2) of the Act,2002 specifically due to tenancy rights that might exist over the said asset, the rent or any other amount which might become due on the said secured asset from the lessee to the borrower (if any) becomes due to the secured creditor. This position was enumerated in S. 13 (4) of the Act,2002, and was solidified by the Hon’ble Supreme Court [9].

Therefore, within the 4 walls of the Act,2002 the secured creditor is well protected if the correct procedure is followed. The SARFAESI Act,2002 is one such legislation that genuinely removes unnecessary and frivolous litigation from the courts, and provides safeguard against the initiation of such litigation at the option of both, the defaulting borrower as well as the secured creditor.

(Views express in this post are of the author, this blog do not take any responsibility.)

E-mail of auther- shreeshchadha @ gmail.com

[1] S. 13 (1), SARFAESI Act, 2002.

[2] S. 36,SARFAESI Act,2002.

[3]ITC Limited v. Blue Coast Hotels Ltd. &OrsCIVIL APPEAL Nos. 2928-2930 OF 2018.

[4] S 13 (3), SARFAESI Act,2002.

[5]Mardia Chemicals Ltd. v. Union of IndiaTransfer Case (civil)  92-95 of 2002.

[6] Rule 8 (6), Security Interest Rules,2002.

[7] Rule 8(8), Security Interest Rules,2002.

[8]Kathikkal Tea Plantations v. State Bank of IndiaMANU/TN/1926/2009.

[9]Harshad Govardhan Sondgar v. International Asset Reconstruction((2014) 6 SCC 1).

The Companies Amendment Ordinance 2019


The Government of India Promulgated the Companies (Amendment) Ordinance, 2019 on 12th January 2019 to give continuing effect to the Companies(Amendment ) Ordinance, 2018 and to amend the Companies Act, 2013. This is notable that the companies (Amendment) Ordinance, 2019 has a significant difference its precursor.

Continue reading

CONVERSION OF PUBLIC COMPANY INTO PRIVATE COMPANY


Law stated in this post is as on 20th December 2018.

With effect from 18th December 2018, conversion of a public company into a private company requires approval from the Central Government. Earlier such conversion requires approval from the National Company Law Tribunal. This change was made by the Company Amendment (Ordinance) 2018 with effect from 2nd November 2018 and the Companies (Incorporation) 4th Amendment Rules, 2018 with effect from 18th December 2018.

Continue reading

Curious case of Rule 20 of Management and Administration Rules


This blog post has a poll on a question – Whether Explanations to Rule 20, placed just after sub – Rule (2) are still part of Rule 20? Read and take part in the poll.

Continue reading

AishMGhrana – Law Governance Responsibility


Dear readers,

Happy New Year 2019!

Year-end is the time to look back and to be happy from your achievement and learn from your mistakes. We always motivate and improve ourselves with this happiness and learning.

235x96_featured-indivine-post

1st Jan 2019: Featured post on IndiBlogger, the biggest community of Indian Bloggers

The blog “AishMGhrana – Law Governance Responsibility” regularly put here its annual reports for public information and sharing our happiness. Our readers are our assets. We are thankful to every reader for the long association since March 2011 and we seek your continuous blessing and patronage.

Our readers can enhance their knowledge by reading this blog anywhere anytime on mobiles, tablets, laptops and desktops. You can always share any blog post. You can also initiate and participate in a discussion by using comment section given below the blog.

We assure our readers that this blog has secured https protocol and completely mobile friendly. The blog is a participant of Accelerated mobile Pages (AMP) program of Google to ensure less mobile data consumption while loading. You can read the blog in the metro, trains, bus and in your office; it is not only a user – friendly and mobile friendly too.

The blog was adjudged as one of the best blogs in India by Indianbloggers.org in category “law” first time in 2013 and it continues to hold this position. Indian Blog critics  IndianTopBlogs.com listed this blog among best blogs on Corporate Affairs for years 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018. The Feedspot lists this blog among “Top 100 Legal Blogs worldwide Every Lawyer and Law Student Must Follow”. This blog is among top 30 blogs on this list of the Feedspot. The Feedspost also lists this blog among “Top 40 Indian Legal Blogs and websites to Follow in 2019” where it is among top 15 blogs.

The blog got about 3.97 lakh page views by 2.69 lakhs unique visitors in the year 2018. During the year, the blog posted 61 posts. The blog now hosts total 689 blog posts and completed 20.97 lakh page-views and 13.60 lakh, unique visitors.

Most of our readers are resident of India and others are from all territories worldwide. Other than India; United States, Canada, Singapore, Malaysia, United Kingdom, Pakistan, South Africa, Kenya and Hong Kong SAR China was important territories with about 1,000 yearly views in the year 2018.

Now 948 committed readers (against 845 last year) subscribed the blog to their email to get instant updates. You may also join mail subscription. 165 fellow blogger – readers (against 144 last year) read the blog on WordPress reader. The blog has 8,620 amazing fans and committed readers through various medium.

Most of our readers landed here on the blog from Search engines. Few others were referred by Mobile apps, Social Media and friends. This year views using mobile phone increased sharply to more than 7,000.

Though these figures speak themselves, we request our readers to use like and share buttons liberally. The blog time to time received many testimonials sent by readers. I request you all to share your experiences and feedback to us.

On-demand, Index of Companies Law Posts as updated at the closing of 31st December 2018 is uploaded here: AishMGhrana INDEX 2019

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Thank you,

Yours Sincerely,

Aishwarya Mohan Gahrana
B.Sc., LL.B., A.I.I.I., F.C.S
Company Secretary and Insolvency Professional
Aishwarya M Gahrana & Associates, New Delhi
aishwaryam_gahrana@yahoo.com
WhatsApp: +91 98689 69599
Corporate Law Blog: https://AishMGhrana.Me AishMGhrana Law Governance Responsibility
Personal Blog: https://gahrana.com गहराना – विचार वेदना की गहराई

Please join blog subscription over email from the homepage.

Go back

Your message has been sent

Warning
Warning
Warning
Warning

Warning.

Financial Year for a company


Law stated in this post is as on 20th December 2018.

Financial Year reflects the reporting period for the purpose of financial and non-financial reporting by a company to its stakeholders including government authorities. Since the financial year of the Government of India is 1st April to 31st March as per the British system. The Companies Act, 2013 aligned financial year for companies registered in India to that of the government. There are certain exemptions to have a different period for the financial year. In this post we will discuss the financial year in light of the companies (Amendment) Ordinance, 2018 read with the companies (Incorporation) Fourth Amendment Rules, 2018 and Notification S.O. 6225 (E) dated 18th December 2018.

Continue reading

COMMENCEMENT OF BUSINESS


The Government of India promulgated a temporary law called the Companies (Amendment) ordinance 2018 on 2nd November 2018 to by parachute landing of few more reform measure. Constitution of India mandate that Government needs to get it approved by Parliament within 6 months.

Readers may read this post as a law applicable with effect from 2nd November 2018 till passing a law by the Parliament, a bill for which was introduced before Loksabha on 20th December 2018. These provisions may continue in force after parliamentary approval. In this post, we will discuss, the reintroduction of Commencement of Business.

Continue reading

CHALLENGES TO BE FACED BY NEW COUNCILS


My fellow members of the Institute of Company Secretaries of India (ICSI) may be going to a booth for voting while reading this post. Similarly, members of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) just concluded their voting last week. These two elections are crucial for the future for these two eminent professions in India, which impact most on financial and non-financial reporting, disclosures and transparency in the working of Corporate India.  Admit or not, these two institutes are facing a crucial issue of survival.

National Financial Reporting Authority – NFRA is already here to oversee accounting standards, auditing standards and quality of services provided by Chartered Accountants. The law establishing the National Financial Reporting Authority – NFRA was incorporate in the statute by Man Mohan Singh Government. Soon thereafter, Chartered Accountants communities made its hue and cry about this law.  There was news of some success for them. Soon after demonetization, Prime Minister Narendra Modi raised a question on quality of services, ethics and values of Chartered Accountants in a much-hyped program organized by ICAI itself. Demonetization failure made it clear that Modi Government will enforce provisions given in the statute for the establishment of NFRA. Finally, it is enforced recently in a slight tone down version. This tone down is, unfortunately, not a face-saving for the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. There is a reasonable apprehension that, irrespective of the party in power, there may be some efforts to extend the application of these provisions to other auditors like company secretaries. Soon to be elected councils of both institutes will certainly draw a plan to take on such an eventuality.

The second challenge for government and to some extent for these self-regulatory statutory institutes is to create completion in regulations and quality standards. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 created a super insolvency regulator the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India with three professional regulators competing with each other. There are suggestions to create such competing professional regulators for auditing bodies – Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, Institute of Cost Accountants of India and Institute of Company Secretaries of India. Will NFRA be the super audit regulator or these three professional bodies be super-regulator for their specific domain? How will they deal with the challenge? Do their members care?

Another challenge is a proposal for a council with representation from all stakeholders (appointed by Government not just elected representatives of regulated professionals). Recently, the Medical Council of India saw drastic changes. Unfortunately, all self-regulatory statutory bodies BCI, MCI, ICAI, ICAI (CMA), ICSI and others have a poor record for their professional duty to regulate their respective profession. Their image is not of statutory regulatory bodies but of a trade union. This is at sharp contrast with other statutory regulatory bodies like Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) which regulates brokers, advisors and many other market professionals; Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) which regulates Actuaries, Undertakers and other insurance professionals; and Reserve Bank of India (RBI) which regulators bankers and other financial advisors. The difference lies in their top management – their council or governing board. Will self-regulatory statutory bodies like ICAI and ICSI develop themselves as true professional regulators or be remain downgraded to be a trade union?

Recently, we saw these self-regulatory statutory bodies took advice from big and powerful advisory firms and companies. Some of these firms and companies have a multinational and national presence. Unfortunately, their powerhouses directly and indirectly influence councils of these self regulatory statutory bodies. This need urgent attention and introduction of organizational governance akin to corporate governance and independency norms.

Our major challenges are from inside but one growing challenge is to regulate multinational firms coming to India. India cannot stop them from coming under WTO regulation. We have one clue to govern them from IBBI regulations. We can ask foreign professional to be part of some firms which are governed under Indian regulations. I should clearly say Big – 4 should be governed by these self regulatory statutory bodies. If not, these self regulatory statutory bodies may be scrapped, sooner than later.

Is India prepared?

Starting of a company without capital


This was an interesting question which I received on Quora here. How can I start a company with no capital? We will have a detailed discussion here.

Continue reading

National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) and its Powers


Section 132 of the Companies Act, 2013 is the point of debate and hope for corporate governance. It paves way for constitution of National Financial Reporting Authority – a super-regulator for statutory auditors – Chartered Accountants. Optimists see it as predecessor of a future super-regulator for self regulatory statutory professional organizations – Institute of Chartered Accountants of India regulating chartered accountants and statutory auditors, Institute of Cost Accountants of India (earlier Institute of Cost and Works Accountants of India) regulating cost and management accountants and cost auditors, and Institute of Company Secretaries of India regulating company secretaries and secretarial auditors. We earlier discussed the provision of Section 132 earlier here.

In this post, we will discuss Section 132 and the National Financial Reporting Authority Rules, 2018 as on 13th November 2018.

In an earlier post here, we discussed Duties of NFRA under Section 132 and the National Financial Reporting Authority Rules, 2018 as on 13th November 2018. In this post, we will discuss powers of NFRA to investigate and disciplinary proceeding as on 13th November 2018.

Continue reading

Debt reconstruction of Venezuela Sovereign and PDVSA bond: Legal problem in reconstruction


Shrashank Tripathi, 4th  Year, B.Com LL.B. (Hons.),
Faculty of Law, Dr Shakuntala Misra National Rehabilitation University, Lucknow


Venezuela is one of the most prosperous countries in Latin America for decades, their oil reserve is significantly large in comparison to other countries nevertheless they are currently in the biggest economic crises of the 21 century. Venezuela economy is built on oil, which accounts for more than 90% of country export, 30% of GDP, its foreign reserve and imports of consumer goods are also substantially based on oil exchange. Venezuela former President Hugo Chavez is a firm believer of socialist economy and “Bolivarian revolution” he adopted a new Constitution in 1999 and form favourable fiscal and monetary policy in pursuance of achieving his so-called 21st Century Socialist economy model.

Venezuela is oil abundant country since 1913 and always use its oil resource to leverage its economy, Hugo Chavez was benefited from the oil boom, when he took office in 1999, oil was $10 a barrel and reaching the peak of $133 a barrel in July 2008. On average oil account 60 per cent of government revenue, Chavez spent a substantial amount of government revenue on social welfare scheme and does not invest capital on other industry, he even does not create any sovereign reserve as a backup for oil price crash. When oil price falls sharply in the International market it exposes Venezuela economic mismanagement and drives the country to hyperinflation.

Economic mismanagement is one of the biggest reasons behind Venezuela economic turmoil, Venezuela heavily relies on oil revenue and the government never tries to diversify their economy. Government Nationalization scheme is another reason for the current crises, Chavez administration wanted to get concentrated and unified power on every industry of the economy so they nationalize telecom, oil, agricultural and other major industry. After nationalization after nationalization labour productivity is declined by 59 per cent and corruption is also increased in every sector. Simultaneously Chavez borrowed external debt to fulfil their fiscal deficit and on investment on the social scheme. Chavez sells oil to Caribbean countries on below market price under the PetroCaribe program and also borrowed money against future oil export. Chavez expects oil price will continue to rise in near future and he can negotiate welfare expenses through oil revenue.

When oil price starts declining in the International market, Government revenue is also starting decreasing to fulfil this gap of revenue and expenditure Chavez start borrowing external debt irrespective of the fact that Venezuela does not have any means for the repayment of debt. On 2013 Hugo Chavez dies because of cancer and his successor Nicola Maduro entered into the office, he inherited an economy with many loopholes and with a big problem, rather than solving he inflate problem with the overvaluation of currency and with printing new currency. Venezuela economy is now in debt trap Venezuela debt represent 50 % of international reserve, until recently Maduro Government had committed to repaying its debt in spite of the fact that they have limited resources and foreign reserve, fearing the legal challenges from creditor in US jurisdiction and seizure of Venezuela assets in the United States, including CITGO (oil company owned by PDVSA), oil shipments, and cash payment for oil.

President Maduro on November 2, 2017, announced that they would seek to restructure of its debt, Government would try to restructure their Sovereign bond and PDVSA bond these two bond amount 60 % of the whole Venezuela external debt and restructuring of the same would be a very cumbersome task. Economist speculate that administration will try only to restructure their Sovereign bond, not PDVSA bond because of two reasons firstly Venezuela oil is sold by PDVSA and if in the stage of negotiation any bondholder sue PDVSA then it might affect the whole economy, and secondly Sovereign bond does not have collective action clause that permits a super-majority of holders (75%) to agree to a restructuring and that decision become binding on minority bondholder, so in absence of this clause restructuring of PDVSA bond would inevitably be a messier affair. But my view is contrary, because of several reasons are given below.

If the government goes for the restructuring of PDVSA bond then they had more bargaining power because indentures may be amended with the consent of only with a bare majority of holder, so government had more option and they will also engineer the terms of a new bond (which represent the restructuring condition) as per the requirement of specific bondholder. PDVSA bond also contain change in obligator clause, as per Section 10.02 of PDVSA bond obligation of the payment can be changed with the consent of a simple majority of the holders of each series of bonds, so if some creditor opposed the restructuring process then government may change the obligation for payment from PDVSA to a newly incorporated company let’s call it “New Infra”. Minority bondholder will join the restructuring process seeing that New Infra is an entity that lacks resources to make any payments. PDVSA bondholder also has limited individual enforcement rights, Standard U.S style trust indentures vest the primary responsibility for enforcing the indenture, the exception to this rule is that bondholder only sue for his principal and interest amount only after the due date, the enforcement of accelerated amounts remains the responsibility of the trustee. So PDVSA bondholder sues only on the event of default and only for their respective amount. Taking these things into consideration Venezuela can restructure their PDVSA bond.

The government also needs to restructure their sovereign bond, the good news with sovereign bind is that they have the collective action clause so the decision of the majority of bondholder will be binding on the minority bondholder and they have to agree with the restructuring condition. It is speculated that Venezuela in the restructuring will use the principle haircut technique in the restructuring but in my view, the country economy is not in the situation to leverage the debt so they should ideally go for the extension of the maturity period.

Countries like China and Russia may also impose hurdle in the restructuring process, USA already imposes economic sanction on Venezuela and stop their citizen from accepting any kind of new bond in the restructuring process. Venezuela is going through big economic crises and only recover from this situation if they get financial assistance from international organizations like IMF. Venezuela also needs to apply the process of debt restructuring more wisely.

Email id- (shrashank123 @ gmail.com)

National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) and its Duties


Section 132 of the Companies Act, 2013 is the point of debate and hope for corporate governance. It paves way for constitution of National Financial Reporting Authority – a super-regulatory for statutory auditors – Chartered Accountants. Optimists see it as predecessor of a future super-regulator for self regulatory statutory professional organizations – Institute of Chartered Accountants of India regulating chartered accountants and statutory auditors, Institute of Cost Accountants of India (earlier Institute of Cost and Works Accountants of India) regulating cost and management accountants and cost auditors, and Institute of Company Secretaries of India regulating company secretaries and secretarial auditors. We earlier discussed the provision of original Section 132 earlier here.

In this post, we will discuss Duties of NFRA under Section 132 and the National Financial Reporting Authority Rules, 2018 as on 13th November 2018. Powers of NFRA to investigate and disciplinary proceeding shall be discussed in next post.

Continue reading

Display of Registered Office Address and Information


Sub-section (3) of Section 12 of the Companies Act, 2013 is one of the most non-compliant sub-sections of section 12 if not of the Companies Act, 2013. It may be noticed that most medium and small size companies do not comply with this important provision.

A company shall display its name and other information in accordance with this subsection. This non-compliance may attract penalty up to one lakh rupees.

Continue reading

A Jump to Relax Special Courts


The government of India promulgated a temporary law called the Companies (Amendment) ordinance 2018 on 2nd November 2018 to by parachute landing of few more reform measure. Constitution of India mandate that Government needs to get it approved by Parliament within 6 months. However, the companies (Amendment) Ordinance, 2018 has nothing which may require urgent attention unless government going to launch large-scale prosecutions against corporates. Moreover, soon after this ordinance government issued a consultation paper for further urgent reforms.

Readers may read this post as a law applicable with effect from 2nd November 2018 till passing law by the Parliament. In this post we will discuss minor changes related to relaxing burden of special courts.

Continue reading