Tag Archives: Corporate Governance

GOOD OPPORTUNITY TO ATTEND AN AGM


Corona is good for corporate governance. The government, without any known intention to do so, adopted an inclusive approach for the benefit of members and shareholder of companies in India. If you are a shareholder in any company in India, this is the best time for you to attend a General Meeting of your company. Of course, you will be part of their decision-making process in all practical manner. Read More to avail best out of this opportunity and share a lot for benefit of lakhs of individual investors and improvement of corporate Governance.

Continue reading

To be director democratically – post 9th February 2018


The Companies Amendment Act, 2017 read with notification dated 9th February 2018 amended law related to the right of a person to be appointed as director of a company under Section 160 of the Companies Act, 2013. Section 160, in its original form, as applicable from 1st April 2014 until 8th February 2018. Section 160 is well ignored but the strong pillar of corporate governance and democracy. We shall discuss amended section 160 here along with its limitations and challenges present before it.

Continue reading

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REQUIREMENTS WITH RESPECT TO SUBSIDIARY OF LISTED ENTITY


In this post we will discuss, corporate governance requirements with respect to subsidiary of listed entity under the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligation and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 for the listed entities which got listed its specified securities on Stock Exchanges.

Continue reading

BOARD COMMITTEES – ENTITY LISTED SPECIFIED SECURITIES


In this post we will discuss, board committees other than audit committee under the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligation and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 for the listed entities which got listed its specified securities on Stock Exchanges. These Regulations talk about Audit Committee (Regulation 18) which we have already discussed here in a recent, Nomination and Remuneration Committee (Regulation 19) Shareholders Relationship Committee (Regulation 20) and Risk Management Committee (Regulation 21).

Nomination and Remuneration Committee

The board of directors shall constitute the nomination and remuneration committee as follows:

  • the committee shall comprise of at least three directors;
  • all directors of the committee shall be non-executive directors; and
  • at least fifty percent of the directors shall be independent directors. [Regulation 19(1)]

As per Section 178 of the Companies Act, 2013, the Nomination and Remuneration Committee shall have with three or more non – executive directors but there is no requirement of all non – executive directors with majority of independent directors as introduced here by Regulation 19(1). However, there is one exception of all non – executive directors rule.

The Chairperson of the nomination and remuneration committee shall be an independent director. However, the chairperson of the listed entity, whether executive or non-executive, may be appointed as a member of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee and shall not chair such Committee. [Regulation 19(2)]

The exception of all non – executive directors rule came here from proviso to Section 178(1) of the Companies act, 2013.

(3) The Chairperson of the nomination and remuneration committee may be present at the annual general meeting, to answer the shareholders’ queries; however, it shall be up to the chairperson to decide who shall answer the queries. [Regulation 19(3)]

This is only an advice in line of Section 178(7) where either chairperson of Nomination or remuneration committee or its nominee member shall present. The combined reading of both provisions is same as of Section 178(7). Significantly, this clarify that chairman of the General meeting may give chance to the chairperson of the committee to answer the queries of shareholders.

(4) The role of the nomination and remuneration committee shall be as specified as in Part D of the Schedule II. [Regulation 19(4)]

Sub – part A of Part D of the Schedule II list out the role of the Committee which shall inter-alia, include the following:

  • formulation of the criteria for determining qualifications, positive attributes and independence of a director and recommend to the board of directors a policy relating to, the remuneration of the directors, key managerial personnel and other employees;
  • formulation of criteria for evaluation of performance of independent directors and the board of directors;
  • devising a policy on diversity of board of directors;
  • identifying persons who are qualified to become directors and who may be appointed in senior management in accordance with the criteria laid down, and recommend to the board of directors their appointment and removal.
  • whether to extend or continue the term of appointment of the independent director, on the basis of the report of performance evaluation of independent directors.

This Regulation 19(4) require and deals with provision for a policy and run parallel to provisions of sub – section (3) and (4) of Section 178 of the Companies Act, 2013.

Stakeholders Relationship Committee

The listed entity shall constitute a Stakeholders Relationship Committee to specifically look into the mechanism of redressal of grievances of shareholders, debentures holders and other security holders. [Regulation 20(1)]

The chairperson of this committee shall be a non-executive director. [Regulation 20(2)]

The board of directors shall decide other members of this committee. [Regulation 20(3)]

The role of the Stakeholders Relationship Committee shall be as specified as in Part D of the Schedule II. [Regulation 20(4)]

Apparently, a non – director may be member of this committee under these Regulation and also in line with provision of Section 178(5).

Sub – part B of Part D of Schedule II state that the Committee shall consider and resolve the grievances of the security holders of the listed entity including complaints related to transfer of shares, non-receipt of annual report and non-receipt of declared dividends.

Risk Management Committee

The board of directors shall constitute a Risk Management Committee. [Regulation 21 (1)]

The majority of members of Risk Management Committee shall consist of members of the board of directors. [Regulation 21(2)]

The Chairperson of the Risk management committee shall be a member of the board of directors and senior executives of the listed entity may be members of the committee. [Regulation 21(3)]

The board of directors shall define the role and responsibility of the Risk Management Committee and may delegate monitoring and reviewing of the risk management plan to the committee and such other functions as it may deem fit. [Regulation 21(4)]

The provisions of this regulation shall be applicable to top 100 listed entities, determined on the basis of market capitalisation, as at the end of the immediate previous financial year. [Regulation 21(5)]

The Companies Act, 2013 has mandate audit committee and independent directors a role in risk management besides inherent role of Board of Directors. However, Regulation 21(5) mandates risk management committee for top 100 listed entities determined on the basis of market capitalization.

Vigil Mechanism

The listed entity shall formulate a vigil mechanism for directors and employees to report genuine concerns. [Regulation 22(1)]

The vigil mechanism shall provide for adequate safeguards against victimization of director(s) or employee(s) or any other person who avail the mechanism and also provide for direct access to the chairperson of the audit committee in appropriate or exceptional cases. [Regulation 22(2)]

Sub – regulation of Regulation 22 is similar to the sub – Section (9) and (10) of Section 177 which deals with audit committee.

Please note: This blog invite readers to share their comments, suggestions, hardship, queries and everything in comment section. This blog post is not a professional advice but just a knowledge sharing initiative for mutual discussion.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS – ENTITY LISTED SPECIFIED SECURITIES


Regulation 17 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligation and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 talk about Board of Directors of a listed entity which got listed its specified securities.

Continue reading

AUDIT COMMITTEE – ENTITY LISTED SPECIFIED SECURITIES


In this post we will discuss, audit committees under the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligation and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 for the listed entities which got listed its specified securities on Stock Exchanges.

Section 177 of the Companies Act, 2013 as discussed earlier here prescribes audit committee for every listed and certain other companies. Regulation 18 of the SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015 supplement this requirement for listed companies.

Continue reading

Definitions: Chapter IV of LODR


Regulation 2 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligation and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 define terms used in these regulations. We have discussed some of these definitions earlier here, here, here and here. Some terms may not have same legal meaning always and require defining as per context and purpose. Regulation 16 of these Regulations defines four terms for the purpose of Chapter IV. As me mentioned in last post, Chapter VI deals with obligation of listed entity which has listed its specified securities on any recognised stock exchange either on main board or on SME Exchange or on institutional platform.

Continue reading

OBLIGATIONS OF LISTED ENTITY WHICH HAS LISTED ITS SPECIFIED SECURITIES


Chapter IV of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligation and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 enumerates obligation of listed entity which has listed its specified securities on any recognised stock exchange either on main board or on SME Exchange or on institutional platform. [Regulation 15(1)]

Continue reading

COMMON OBLIGATIONS OF LISTED ENTITIES -2


Chapter III of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligation and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 enumerates common obligations of listed entities. In this post, we will discuss some of these obligations related to Intermediaries, filings, grievance redressal mechanism Continue reading

COMMON OBLIGATIONS OF LISTED ENTITIES -1


Chapter III of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligation and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 enumerates common obligations of listed entities. In this post, we will discuss some of these obligations related to Key Managerial Personnel, Compliance officer and Share Transfer Agent.

Continue reading

GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES GOVERNING DISCLOSURES AND OBLIGATIONS


Regulation 4 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations 2015 enumerates principles governing disclosure and obligations of listed entities. There are two different set of principles one is general and second governance principles. In this post, we will discuss, governance principles.

Corporate Governance Principle

The listed entity which has listed its specified securities shall comply with the corporate governance provisions as specified in chapter IV which shall be implemented in a manner so as to achieve the objectives of the principles mentioned in Regulation 4(2) of SEBI (LODR) Regulations 2015.

Continue reading

MEMBER AND NOMINEE OF ONE PERSON COMPANY


Clause (62) of the Companies Act 2013 defines “One Person Company” means a company which has only one person as a member. According to clause (68) of this section as well as Clause (c) of Sub- section (1) of Section 3; one person company is a private company.

Rule 3 of the Companies (Incorporation) Rules, 2014 say only a natural person shall be eligible to incorporate one person company. Such one person shall be Indian citizen and a resident of India. A non – resident Indian or a Foreign Citizen resident in India may not incorporate a one person company. Same rules are applicable to nominee of the sole member of a one person company.

Continue reading

NAME AVAILABILITY FOR COMPANY NAMES


Name Availability for Indian companies shall be governed by Rule 8 of the Companies (Incorporation) Rules 2014 under the authority of the Companies Act, 2013.

Determine Identical Names:

The rules firstly say that before granting any name, it will be examined whether name is identical with name of any other company/LLP or any other name already allowed to a company/LLP.

Continue reading

Representation before Stakeholders on Companies Rules 2014


Dear Stakeholders of Corporate India,

As a most vibrant corporate community of the world, you are aware or recent unwelcome development related to corporate India like Satyam, Sahara and Saradha. These developments raised strong concern among us and Parliament of India as well. This reflects in core principles of the Companies Act, 2013. India has some of the best corporate governance and social responsibility norms in the world.

Continue reading

Specification of Definitions Details


The Companies (Specification of definitions details) Rule, 2014 defines some additional terms which have not be defined in the Act. These rules clarify two terms already defined in the Act but need executive clarification as the Act.

Continue reading

OFFICIAL LIQUIDATORS


Here, we will discuss provisions related to Official Liquidator.

APPOINTMENT OF OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR (SECTION 359)

For the purposes of this Act, so far as it relates to the winding up of companies by the Tribunal, the Central Government may appoint as many Official Liquidators, Joint, Deputy or Assistant Official Liquidators as it may consider necessary to discharge the functions of the Official Liquidator.

Continue reading

GENERAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO WINDING UP – 3


We will continue to discuss general provisions relating to winding up in this post also.

Certain limited powers of Company Liquidator (Section 343)

(1) The Company Liquidator may—

(a) with the sanction of the Tribunal, when the company is being wound up by the Tribunal; and

(b) with the sanction of a special resolution of the company and prior approval of the Tribunal, in the case of a voluntary winding up,—

(i) pay any class of creditors in full;

(ii) make any compromise or arrangement with creditors or persons claiming to be creditors, or having or alleging themselves to have any claim, present or future, certain or contingent, against the company, or whereby the company may be rendered liable; or

(iii) compromise any call or liability to call, debt, and liability capable of resulting in a debt, and any claim, present or future, certain or contingent, ascertained or sounding only in damages, subsisting or alleged to subsist between the company and a contributory or alleged contributory or other debtor or person apprehending liability to the company, and all questions in any way relating to or affecting the assets or liabilities or the winding up of the company and take any security for the discharge of any such call, debt, liability or claim, and give a complete discharge in respect thereof.

Continue reading

CSR Policy; Publication and Reporting


CSR policy of Indian companies may have more similarities than any other thing. Section 135 read with Schedule VII of the companies Act 2013 decide four corner of CSR policy of Indian companies, which is guided by and supplementary to development vision of Government of India.

Corporate Social Responsibility committee is primary body to formulate and recommend the CSR policy and expenditure thereon. The committee also has to monitor CSR policy implementation and logically expenditure thereon. The Board of a company may approve the policy and budget allocation for different aspect of CSR initiatives.

Continue reading

GENERAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO WINDING UP – 2


We will continue to discuss general provisions relating to winding up in this post also.

OFFENCE BY OFFICERS OF COMPANIES IN LIQUIDATION (SECTION 336):

If any person, who is or has been an officer of a company which, at the time of the commission of the alleged offence, is being wound up, whether by the Tribunal or voluntarily, or which is subsequently ordered to be wound up by the Tribunal or which subsequently passes a resolution for voluntary winding up,—

Continue reading

GENERAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO WINDING UP – 1


Now, we will discuss general provisions related to winding up applicable to every mode of winding up.

DEBTS OF ALL DESCRIPTIONS TO BE ADMITTED TO PROOF (SECTION 324):

In every winding up (subject, in the case of insolvent companies, to the application in accordance with the provisions of this Act or of the law of insolvency), all debts payable on a contingency, and all claims against the company, present or future, certain or contingent, ascertained or sounding only in damages, shall be admissible to proof against the company, a just estimate being made, so far as possible, of the value of such debts or claims as may be subject to any contingency, or may sound only in damages, or for some other reason may not bear a certain value.

Continue reading